Slimr: independent and evidence first Every diet reviewed against the research

Fasting & meal-timing approaches

Alternate-day fasting

Limited evidence

Alternates normal eating days with fasting or very-low-calorie days, a more intensive fasting schedule than 5:2.

What people typically eat

Normal meals on eating days; either nothing or around 500 kcal on fasting days.

What is restricted

Roughly half of all days carry severe restriction.

Why people try it

Faster weight loss than weekly fasting patterns, and interest in metabolic research.

Realistic advantages

  • Produces meaningful weight loss in trials
  • No food rules on eating days
  • One of the better-studied fasting protocols

Realistic disadvantages

  • One of the hardest patterns to sustain, dropout rates are high
  • Hunger does not fully adapt even after weeks for many people
  • Trials show no clear advantage over ordinary daily calorie restriction

Strength of evidence

Limited evidence

Adequate short-term trials, but high dropout and no demonstrated long-term superiority.

Key studies

  • Trepanowski et al., JAMA Internal Medicine, 2017. Alternate-day fasting produced similar weight loss to daily calorie restriction, with higher dropout rates.

Likely cost and difficulty

Low cost; very high difficulty.

Nutritional risks

Fatigue, irritability, and over-restriction in people prone to disordered eating.

Who should avoid it

Pregnancy, adolescence, eating-disorder history, diabetes on medication, and physically demanding jobs on fast days.

Is professional supervision advisable?

Advisable, this is an intensive protocol.

References

Written by the Slimr editorial team. How we review diets.

Illustration for the Alternate-day fasting review on Slimr

Where to go next

Share this page